VEDA

Eva Löfdahl has built a substantial body of work that resists linear narrative. Her practice highlights points of potential within the most ordinary materials, forms, and situations, allowing the artist to reconfigure meaning in unexpected and surprising ways. What may initially register as an impenetrability familiar to contemporary art – a refusal to explain or reveal itself – becomes, in Löfdahl’s hands, a form of precision grounded in her attention to both poetic potentials and material logic. The exhibition Counterflow, at Veda, highlights this undertaking, which has been at the core of Löfdahl’s artistic career for over 40 years. Most commonly used to describe physical phenomena such as currents, traðc, or movement against a dominant direction, the term “counterflow” suggests here a perceptual resistance: a way of working that moves against habitual readings. The exhibition brings together three overlapping bodies of work. At its centre is An Audile Double (2022–2024), a series of 33 photographs of jellyfish washed up on a beach. Distributed across the gallery, the unframed images extend over eighteen metres along one wall and into a niche, appearing almost incidental at first, yet calibrated so that each jellyfish can be encountered as its own singular form. Stranded on the shore - some still living, most already dead- the photographs show the translucent jellyfish reflecting the light of the sun, turning their gelatinous shapes into temporary lenses. The species, Aurelia aurita, is commonly known as the “ear jellyfish,” named after aurita, which translates as “having ears,” in reference to the tiny ear-like structures on its body. The title, An Audile Double, thus implies an identification with the jellyfish through the sense of hearing, offering an unexpected point of departure for interpreting the work. Running through the exhibition as a spatial extension of this photographic work is Untitled (2011), a set of seven metal chains that emerge from the gallery walls and rest on the floor like long tails. The decision to include this body of work was inspired by the architecture of the space itself: pipes, cables, and bars that cut across the windows and assert themselves as structural facts. The chains, Löfdahl notes in our correspondence, can “stand such strong elements.” They read as part of the building’s vocabulary: a latent mechanism of connection, a two-way channel between the gallery interior and what lies outside. Here, the chain becomes both an object and an infrastructure. Installed in relation to the photographs, it extends the exhibition’s logic of seriality into physical space. That meaning is further unsettled by the way the chains taper into thinner, almost tentacle-like ends,